Few rule questions..

[Parrier Johan]

Scenario a)

Player 1(tobi) kills a guy whom he called a kos on without reason... He runs away with his t buddy inside a little shack without IDing a body, it's by second nature to move on to conclusion by exclusion, being only 4 people left in the round, there was me, one dude, and 2 traitors (4 total).. So, I kill both of them hiding in the shack.

Moments later.. I am slain for RDM

Was this considered RDM?


________________________

Scenario b)

I had baited 3 players to get tested on the minecraft map, where if you're in, you're in until someone lets you out. As a traitor, I decided to set a C4 up for the 3 players to die instead of killing them one by one, MonkeyChicken decides to use !unstuck to get out of dying by the C4, and out of the traitor tester.

TheCarrot and MonkeyChicken deem it being okay, as !unstuck can be used at any time for any mechanic. I assume this is not right to exploit mechanics to get out of dying.

Is this considered okay?

________________________

Scenario c)

Everytime someone had RDM'd me, MonkeyChicken would take my request, and it would be blatant RDM, he chooses not to slay the person who blatantly RDM'd me, because it's his "decision".

Is this considered okay?


Thanks for your time,
Johan

[TheTrump27]

A. If he false kosed an inno you have the right to kill him.
B.No its not and I was being sarcastic I think I slayed him for it.
C.Im pretty sure he closed it on accident. (It was one report)

[monkeychicken]

A- You can kill tobi for KOS, but you can't kill the other unless you had definite proof that second guy was t
B- pretty sure carrot slayed me for that
c- I asked carrot over voice to add the slays since I accidentally closed it, which carrot did

[Dark Swordsman]

I was kosed, but not my t buddy, You were slain by monkeychicken for killing somebody whom you had no proof on. Being near me isnt kosable, He may not have known I was the T yet

[Parrier Johan]

I was kosed, but not my t body, You were slain by monkeychicken for killing somebody whom you had no proof on. Being near me isnt kosable, He may not have known I was the T yet

He had watched you kill someone, yet did nothing about it.

---

A. If he false kosed an inno you have the right to kill him.
B.No its not and I was being sarcastic I think I slayed him for it.
C.Im pretty sure he closed it on accident. (It was one report)

A. Okay
B. You didn't slay him for it, you said it's okay if you want to be KOS'd.
C. Okay, makes sense.

[TheTrump27]

He had watched you kill someone, yet did nothing about it.

---

A. Okay
B. You didn't slay him for it, you said it's okay if you want to be KOS'd.
C. Okay, makes sense.

again it was sarcasm

[Dark Swordsman]

He had watched you kill someone, yet did nothing about it.

---

No he didnt. I dragged the unid in there and he was happened to be there. So what? It was RDM since he hadnt done anything traitoruous or shot a bullet yet that Ive seen. You were correctly slain as nowhere in T acts does it say, "Being near Ts and not attacking them is KOS." Its a players choice to follow KOSes

[Parrier Johan]

No he didnt. I dragged the unid in there and he was happened to be there. So what? It was RDM since he hadnt done anything traitoruous or shot a bullet yet that Ive seen. You were correctly slain as nowhere in T acts does it say, "Being near Ts and not attacking them is KOS." Its a players choice to follow KOSes

Because you can see behind your back? Makes sense.

again it was sarcasm

You should be clear, direct, and concise with your statements and not use sarcasm to differ from the truth.

[TheTrump27]

Because you can see behind your back? Makes sense.
You should be clear, direct, and concise with your statements and not use sarcasm to differ from the truth.

i apologize for not being direct

[Zellogi]

A - Calling a KOS on a player, and finding out later that the KOS was on an innocent, you can KOS whoever called the KOS and it would not be RDM, as long as you say this in the reponse (if you're reported).
B - Though technically not in the rules (had to re-read to make sure), I would have definitely added a slay to him for !stuck abuse.
C - Even if he closes the report on accident, it's still possible to give slays; if he didn't do this, that's not doing his job and if this continues, his position as Operator should be up for discussion.