make all votes on sandbox have to be approved by an admin

[Demonik1]

Alright so I know on TTT there is a mechanic that every vote ban, vote kick, etc. have to be approved by an admin before it can go through, this would be very useful on sandbox as there are a lot of false votes that go through which end up getting people banned for outrageous times for stuff that is against the rules, and because of the ban changes, admins cant just "undo" false votes so if that system can be put into sandbox that would make things better for everyone

[WTF-GamerZ]

What would be the point of the Vote system if an admin has to be on to accept the vote?

[Ripjaw]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure on TTT admins do not have the ability to accept/deny votekicks and votebans that they themselves did not create.

[Demonik1]

What would be the point of the Vote system if an admin has to be on to accept the vote?

because when admins are on people like to make votebans and votekicks on people who arent even breaking rules, and if theres no admins on then this would not apply

[SaintLuther]

I have no idea what this functionality this is you speak of. I would have to manually add that functionality to each vote command. And this would not work if no admins were on, or if the admins were afk.

[UHC]

if it had to be admin approved, then why even bother letting anyone below an admin have the ability to votekick/voteban to begin with?

[Deucedemon]

I would actually like this. However there is a downside. what if there is only members on and some rule breakers they would not be able to use there commands correctly. maybe make it where admins can unban people who was vote ban and also add the vote-denie system ulx has. We have ad a increasing amount of ulx kicks/bans recently. Including one where where they kicked a player for following them. A vote denie system would be nice plus the ability for admins to unban a player that was banned by vote that has no good/no reason.

[Zellogi]

The idea is nice but it has flaws that have already been stated.

[Demonik1]

Ok how about we change this up a bit, maybe instead of having to be approved, how about maybe if an admin realizes a vote is autism maybe they can veto it? To prevent false votebans/kicks

[Wayne]

Ok how about we change this up a bit, maybe instead of having to be approved, how about maybe if an admin realizes a vote is autism maybe they can veto it? To prevent false votebans/kicks

Sounds better if it was this I would +Vouch